A life in pursuit of freedom, truth, and beauty.一生追求自由、真理与美。

Alone with Lyrics Under an Autumn Lamp

Autumn 2025 · Essay

On writing

I have been reading Wang Guowei’s Remarks on Lyrics. I agree strongly with his theory of jingjie — artistic world, or “realm” — and it fits how I think about making prose, so I copied a few lines and added notes of my own.

In lyrics, realm is the highest thing. Where there is realm, a high style follows of itself, and famous lines as well. Realm is not scenery only. Joy, anger, grief, and pleasure are also a realm in the human heart. Whoever can write true scenery and true feeling has realm; otherwise, none.
In the work of a master, feeling must soak the heart, and scenery must open the eyes and ears. The wording comes as if spoken, with no look of being dressed and forced. Because what they have seen is true, and what they know is deep.

I have come to see this. When I was young I sometimes wrote to flash my talent. I was still small; I had not lived much, and by nature I was cool. Where would deep feeling have come from? It was only “forcing sorrow to make a new poem.” Now I see writing like my old writing: gorgeous at first glance, and it does not hold. However ornate, it is language without a soul, only pretending to be deep. Over-ornament is a vase: surface, not literature.

Beauty is in the bone, not the skin. A true beauty, even in coarse clothes and loose hair, does not hide her color. Prose is the same.

The lyric poet is one who has not lost the heart of a child.

True literature is not carving phrases. It is writing one’s real feeling with a child’s heart. In Alaska I once said: only a soul like a glacier can write prose that leaves no trace of effort. The same thought from another side.

Toward the universe and human life, a poet must enter, and also step out. Enter, and he can write it; step out, and he can see it. Enter, and there is life; step out, and there is high manner.

This is interesting. I think most people can enter and cannot leave. They are stuck in the dust, cannot jump free — they do not know the mountain’s true face, being on the mountain — so the pattern is small, and there is no high manner. I was the opposite extreme: I could leave and could not enter. From childhood I did not fit the ordinary world. I watched joy and grief from a cold distance, and kept out of anything I could not control. My family often said I did not eat the smoke of human life. The pieces I wrote as a boy still have a kind of spirit, but too much pride, not enough blood.

I see now that blood has to be looked for among people. Not walking through a crowd — that only gives the feeling I wrote as a child, “crossing a flourishing desert alone.” You have to deal with people, make a real tie. Do not run. Do not fear being pulled in. Put down the arrogance of talent, put down the bias against the ordinary, come down from the high platform of thought, and walk up to that person.

On ideals

Wang Guowei’s three realms of life I knew as a child and did not understand. Now I have a little of my own sense of them.

Last night the west wind withered the green trees. I climbed the high tower alone, and looked to the end of the sky’s road.

The first realm is horizon. Every clear evening, when I go to the roof for the sunset, I think of this. The west wind withering the trees fits a hard world, a season of trouble, people worn down, the same everywhere. Climbing the high tower alone means a larger platform; “alone” has a lonely pride. Looking to the end of the sky’s road is large-minded: stand high, see far. The mushroom does not know a month; the cicada does not know a year. A wide view from the tower is the condition for seeing the road to the end. For me, coming to America opened my eyes in a way life at home did not. Reading and thinking without stopping, I do see more choices. Even so, if you have seen every road to its end — which to take? What life do I want? What is the truth of the world? How does one become free? With those questions I often stall in the airy house of thought.

The belt grows slack, and I do not regret. For her I will let myself grow worn.

The second realm is clinging. I know this. I am extremely stubborn. Once I decide a thing I go alone, and would not turn if I hit the wall. If the whole world stood against me I would still hold to what I had set my heart on. That clinging has served me; I have rarely failed to get what I wanted. But I have spent it on small tasks — using an ox-knife to kill a chicken. In the large direction I still waver. If I once chose a road I would walk it without turning, and in time I would do something. Some say the large direction is not thought out but made by one concrete thing after another. That may be true. The road is long; I will seek high and low.

I looked for her a thousand times in the crowd. Suddenly I turned, and that person was there, where the lamps were few.

The third realm is hope. You search so long and fail, turn your head, and see. Without those thousand searches, there would probably be no sudden turning. Luck seems conserved, somehow. After much in America, in the hardest time I believed heaven does not wall a person in. That kept me going until the worst turned, luck came, and things went as I wished. Mountains and rivers, no road; willows dark, flowers bright, another village. What looked unclimbable is now a light story. As for the meaning of a life and the source of the world, I have not had that kind of awakening. I keep hoping, and looking. Perhaps one day I will see.

On feeling

I find the three realms can also read feeling. When young the poet knows many people, and some of it is play; proud of his gift, he climbs the tower alone and looks to the end of the sky. Alive in the world, he still wants a companion of the heart, so he clings to one person: the belt slacks, he does not regret, for her he grows worn. Knowing it cannot be, he does it anyway. That person is on the other side of the water. He knew, and still, facing it, he is lost. Why? Why this? After a thousand thoughts he turns, and sees the one where the lamps are few — and that person looks up, and is himself.

Feeling seems to be toward another, and comes from the self. For “I,” another person is an object seen through my eyes, not the person as they are. The same thing is different in different eyes — not because the object changed, but because the one who looks did. “I” is the subject. All feeling for others still lands on “I.” Attend too hard to the self and it is like looking at the sun; the eyes hurt. Seeing others in the light is easier, and you see yourself more clearly.

A cool nature treats all outer things as equally none of his business. He is not disturbed, but a layer sits between him and the world, as if he had not quite lived, and did not know joy or pain — like a stone. Feeling makes him more like a person. Because he attends to one particular person, he attends to all that is around that person, from a point to a surface, to the whole world. The fog between him and the world thins. The world becomes alive in his eyes. Much he could not feel, he feels; poems he could not read, he can.

What the feeling is aimed at matters less. In “the belt grows slack… for her I grow worn” — who is “her”? No one cares. Scenery or person, both are outer things. “Human life is a fool for feeling; this grief has nothing to do with wind and moon.” Feeling belongs to the poet, and is only thrown onto things, which then take on color as if in sunlight. Hundreds of years later people will not remember the object in the poem; the object can be whatever the reader brings. The slack-belt lines were written of a beauty; later many take them as unregretting pursuit of an ideal, and the object becomes the ideal. So the feeling in the poem is what matters — it crosses time and station and becomes something human beings share.

Once you see this, the poet has a free mind, and can go in and out of the world: not cut off from it, not trapped by things, with a kind of ease. A small boat gone from here; the rest of life given to river and sea. Some of this I have understood, and have not the strength of the brush to write. There is a true meaning in it; I want to tell it, and have forgotten the words.

秋夜灯下独品词

Autumn 2025 · Essay

论文章

最近读王国维的《人间词话》,对他的“境界说”十分赞同,感觉与我的文章创作理念不谋而合,于是抄录几句并略谈些自己的见解。

词以境界为最上,有境界则自成高格,自有名句。境非独谓景物也。喜怒哀乐,亦人心中之一境界。故能写真景物,真感情者,谓之有境界,否则谓之无境界。
大家之作,其言情也必沁人心脾,其写景也必豁人耳目,其辞脱口而出,无矫揉妆束之态。以其所见者真,所知者深也。

我也领悟到了这点,以前少年时写文章,有时会锋芒毕露地显示自己的文才,其实那时年纪尚小,对人生体会不深,更兼本性淡漠,又哪来什么很深的感情呢?不过是为赋新词强说愁。现在又看到有人的文字跟我小时候写的东西类似,初看十分华美却经不起推敲,再华丽也不过是没有灵魂的文字,只是在故作深沉罢了。这种过于矫饰之词就像个花瓶般空有其表,算不上文学。

美人在骨不在皮,真正的美人,虽粗服乱头,不掩其色。文章亦是如此。

词人者,不失其赤子之心者也。

真正的文学不是雕词琢句,而是以一颗赤子之心写尽自己的真感情。在阿拉斯加时,我曾言:只有像冰川一样的灵魂才能写出不着痕迹的文字。与此有异曲同工之妙。

诗人对宇宙人生,须入乎其内,又须出乎其外。入乎其内,故能写之;出乎其外,故能观之。入乎其内,故有生气;出乎其外,故有高致。

此论十分有趣。我想大多数人应该都是“能入而不出”,陷于红尘之中,无法跳脱出来,不识庐山真面目,只缘身在此山中,因此格局浅陋,无有高致。而我却是一个相反的极端,我的写作曾遇到过“能出而不入”的问题。我从小便与世俗格格不入,习惯冷眼旁观人间的悲欢离合,避免自己卷进任何不可掌控之事。因此,我的家人常说我不食人间烟火。我少年时写的文章,现在看仍颇有灵气,但清傲有余,生气不足。

现在悟出了,生气自当到人间去寻。不是在人群中穿梭而过,那只能得到像我小时候写的“独自一人穿过一片繁华的沙漠”的感受。要跟人互动,建立真正的联系。不要逃避,不要害怕卷进去,放下自恃才华的傲慢,放下对世俗的偏见,从思想的高台上走下来,走到那人面前。

论理想

王国维的“人生三境界”之论,我很小时就知道,当时不太懂,现在看却略有了些自己的体会。

昨夜西风凋碧树,独上高楼,望尽天涯路。

第一境,此为眼界。每个晴朗的黄昏,我登上天台看日落,都会想起此句。西风凋碧树,暗合当今世界大环境不好,多事之秋,民生凋敝,哪里都一样。独上高楼,意味着来到更大的平台,“独”字则显出孤傲不群之意。望尽天涯路,气魄宏大,站得高,看得远。朝菌不知晦朔,蟪蛄不知春秋,高楼上开阔的视野是望尽天涯路的前提。对我来说,来美国让我开阔眼界,增长见识,与在国内时不可同日而语。加上一直读书和不断反思,确实能看见得更多的选择与可能性。然而,即使是望尽天涯,看到了每条路延伸的尽头,可是这么多条路该如何选择?我到底想过怎样的一生?世界的真相是什么?怎样才能获得真正的自由?带着这许多问题,我常常在思考的空中楼阁上踟蹰不前。

衣带渐宽终不悔,为伊消得人憔悴。

第二境,此为执著。我对此深有体会,因为我就是一个极其固执的人。我只要认定一件事,就会一意孤行,九死不悔,即使撞了南墙我也不会回头。哪怕全世界都站在我的对立面,我依然会坚持自己心中所向。这种执著让我无往而不利,我想要的东西从来没有得不到的。然而,我总是把这种精神用在一些具体的事务上,真可谓杀鸡焉用宰牛刀?可是我在大方向上仍是摇摆不定,如果一旦选定一条路,我会矢志不渝地走下去,假以时日必定可以有所作为。有人说,大方向不是想出来的,是靠着一个个具体事情做出来的,似乎也有道理。路漫漫其修远兮,吾将上下而求索。

众里寻他千百度,蓦然回首,那人却在,灯火阑珊处。

第三境,此为希望。寻了那么久未果,一回头却看见了。但没有前面那千百度的追寻,大概也不会有那蓦然回首的瞬间。似乎冥冥之中运气是守恒的。来美国经历了许多事情,在最艰难困苦之时,我相信天无绝人之路,这让我继续坚持下去,直到否极泰来,时来运转,一切皆如所愿。山重水复疑无路,柳暗花明又一村。当时看似不可逾越的艰难险阻,如今也都成了风轻云淡的笑谈。不过,对于人生的意义和世界的本源,我还没有体会这种顿悟,但我仍保持希望,不断追寻,也许终有一天能悟道。

论情

忽然发现论情也可用人生三境界解之。诗人年少时交游甚广,不乏逢场作戏,然而其人恃才傲物,故而独上高楼,望尽天涯。可人生在世,其人也想寻个红颜知己以慰平生,于是执著于一个人,衣带渐宽终不悔,为伊消得人憔悴。真乃知其不可为而为之!但终是不可为,所谓伊人,在水一方。尽管早知如此,真正面对时,仍感到怅惘。为什么?何必如此?在千百度的苦苦思量后,蓦然回首,看见了灯火阑珊处的那人,那人一抬头,竟是他自己。

情,看似对人,实则源于己。对“我”来说,别人是通过“我”的眼睛看到的一个对象,而并非其本身。同一件事物,不同的人眼中是不同的,这并不是对象不同,而是因为观察主体不同。“我”是主体,一切对别人的情,最终仍是着眼于“我”本身。过于关注自己,就像直视太阳,眼睛难免刺痛。看到阳光照耀下的他人,却容易得多,明心见性,反而对自己看得更透彻了。

一个生性淡漠之人,外物在他眼中,都是平等地与他不甚相干。这样固然能不为外物所扰,却是与世界隔了一层,好像没有真正在世上活过,不知何为快乐,何为痛苦,就像一块石头。情,让他变得更像一个人。因为关注一个具体的人,他开始关注这个人周围的一切,由点及面,以至于整个世界。隔在他和世界之间的雾气慢慢消散,他忽然发现这个世界在他眼中变得鲜活了起来。很多之前感受不到的东西,现在他能感受到了;很多以前读不懂的诗,现在他也能读懂了。

至于情的对象是什么,反而不重要。“衣带渐宽终不悔,为伊消得人憔悴” 诗中的这个“伊”是谁?无人在意。诗中的对象,无论是景,还是人,都是外物。正所谓,“人生自是有情痴,此恨不关风与月。” 情是诗人本身具有的东西,只是投射到外物上,外物才像在阳光照耀下一般有了色彩。千百年后,人们记住的并不会是诗中的对象,因为对象可以是人们在阅读时所联想到的任何个性化的东西。譬如“衣带渐宽”句,诗人原本的写作对象是美人,但后世许多人却把这句话当作对理想的无悔追寻,诗中的对象在他们眼中就变成了理想。因此,诗中蕴含的情,才是真正重要的东西,能穿越古今,跨越身份地位,成为一种人类所共通的东西。

领悟了这点,诗人就有了自由的心境,可以随意出入世界之内外,既与世界不隔,也不会困于外物,自有一种风流旷达。小舟从此逝,江海寄余生。有些东西自己悟了,然则笔力不够,写不出来。正所谓,此中有真意,欲辨已忘言。